I’ve been thinking about memory a lot lately. It’s a recurring theme in the usual wanderings of my mind, but recently it’s been spurred by external prodding.
The Whiteman Brothers are a set of filmmakers in Portland who dream up strange and beautiful stories and actually see their imaginings through. They’re what you can consider successful artists. When they asked me to be in their latest, Childhood Machine, as a character called Memory Foe, I didn’t hesitate. We wrapped a few weeks ago, after an intense but truly amazing six days. And my mind has been stuck on memory since.
My character is out to destroy memory, having had a really good one that makes it hard for all others to live up to. She feels memory has wronged her, and as an act of self-preservation and for the good of humanity, she spends her days on the streets, canvassing against it. Her endeavors lead her to Childhood Machine, who has his own absurd ambitions, and her mission sparks his interest. He agrees to help her. If she collects the data, he will analyze it. He promises results. So she sets up shop, lemonade stand-style, paying a gold dollar for people’s best and worst memories.
The thing is, we actually did this. And for about six hours, I listened to over thirty unscripted best and worst-ofs. By the end, I felt like I’d been emotionally wrung out, like a desiccated sink sponge; a maple tree fully-tapped and syrupless.
These are my findings.
1.) We all have good and bad memories, but we tend to most easily recall the bad, or at least that’s the type that gets a vice grip of a hold on us.
There was the girl who came across a fiery and fatal car
accident on her way to spring break. The first to arrive on the scene,
she and her friends called 9-1-1 and she had to keep one of the
victims conscious until help arrived. He’d been ejected from
the car that his girlfriend was still trapped inside,
burning alive. The other car contained a family that all
perished. Her best memory was…that spring break. Although, I’d imagine
anything experienced immediately after a tragedy like that
would seem best, in comparison.
2.) Every memory has validity and relevance on a very personal scale. Everyone has her own barometer of good and bad; you can’t compare degrees of bad. Still, the range of depths of hell is drastic.
a.) A twelve-year-old girl’s best memory was getting an American Girl
doll that she partially paid for, for Christmas. Her worst memory was losing her
retainer for two days, because it was expensive, and she was going to have to
pay for it.
b.) There was the junkie whose worst memory was that he died,
just the night before. He’d checked himself into rehab a few
months ago and returned to Portland where he fell back into the
same habits that led to the eventual overdose. He was “so bad”
that one of the EMTs bailed before they even got him into the
elevator. They poked him 29 times, trying to inject some Narcan.
But his veins were all collapsed and it wouldn’t take. Then his
heart stopped and he died for five minutes. They finally shot
a huge needle into his heart and brought him back
to life.
3.) Most worst memories are recalled from a young age–seven–almost across the board. Maybe seven is just a highly impressionable age. Or maybe it’s the age you become aware of the world enough to understand realities like death and loss of innocence.
a.) There was the guy who was just seven when his father was murdered by three teens high on crack.
b.) One man was seven when he got the news that his five-
year-old brother was dead. The brother had just dropped off a
forgotten pair of glasses to him, and was returning to school
when he was hit and killed by a car. The man said he was pulled
out of class and told “Steven is dead.” So he went around to all
the houses of his friends named Steven and asked if they were
OK. It wasn’t until he finally went home and found his father crying
at the kitchen table, that he understood.
4.) A person’s good and bad memories don’t usually equal in intensity.
There was the seven-year-old girl whose best memory was when
her best friend’s Clif bar accidentally fell into her lunchbox.
This memory was grossly eclipsed by her worst: when her
babysitter died.
A few times people got weepy and it was hard for me hold it together. Sometimes I hugged the person afterwards. I felt like sopping up all the pain that oozed from them, swabbing the deck of all these horrible memories. By the end of the day, I was convinced, like my character, that memory should be obliterated. Still, when confronted about the idea, most people disagreed. They’d rather the bad with the good–even if it meant much more bad–than none at all.
If you eradicate the bad memories, some reasoned, you’d also be eradicating the knowledge gained from them. This got me thinking of memory as a survival mechanism.
One guy wondered how he’d know where his keys were when he got up in the morning. You wouldn’t lose muscle memory, I argued, just moment memory. It’s different. But I couldn’t convince him. I don’t think so, he said, politely waving me off.
One woman suggested that there’d be no such thing as a good memory without the existence of the bad. The dichotomy may seem cruel, but it’s necessary for the very existence of the good ones. Otherwise, it would just be plain old memory, and far less significant. Or maybe it wouldn’t exist at all.
I tried to convince an old woman that memories were just reminders of what once was. She smiled and looked away thoughtfully, warmly. I like them, she said, shaking her head. This got me thinking about memory as a durable scrap book, a sentimental record of where you’d been and who you were.
I likened memory to a deceptive friend. It’s a fictionalized version of reality; you can’t trust it. Why would you want to keep something like that around? Does that matter, one man asked. Don’t you read literature? Don’t you watch movies? Not everything has to be true to be relevant. Not everyone’s version of the truth is the same. I’m colorblind, he said pointing. That grass is not green.
And as far as I can remember, it wasn’t.
37.789469
-122.436212